[601B] Wt. 36325/814 50m. 1/49 C.N.Ld. 748
44. 24 NOV
53848/49
22
3/4
C. O.
Radford 18/11
Mr.
Mr. McNulty
14x1
Hall
Mr.
24/11 F/5.
Mr.
Mr.
Permt. U.S. of S.
Parly. U.S. S.
Your Reference..
DRAFT.
(1)
P.D. COATES, ESQ.,
5a3
F.0.
Saz
4c
(2) C.G.H. CARDO, ESQ.,
ADM RALTY.
Extract opening sentence and X of 'B' of Section 39 X of ordinance attached.
(stit)
Minister of State
Secretary of State
Ansid (7)
(To (2)) M. 0.1906/49.
Dear
Coates
Cards,
23-11-49
+ (1) a'50
(To (1)) Will you please refer to
(To (2)) Thank you for your letter
of the 1st November, 1949 in which you
referred to (To both) the Governor of
Hong Kong's telegram No. 1144 about
the limits of the Colony's
territorial waters off the western
coast of Lantao. I attach a copy of
the section of the Hong Kong
Interpretation Ordinance of 1911 to
which reference is made.
2. It is apparent from the
telegram that Hong Kong have no qualms
about their right to exercise jurisdiction
in waters within the boundaries
described in the 1911 Ordinance (which,
for a
discrepancy
except for a diserépaney in the south
*
consegued with
gutter fren Lange west corner, correspond with the
FURTHER ACTION.
boundaries of the area leased under
the Peking Convention of 1898) and they
are in doubt only as regards waters off
the western coast of Lantao which
lie outside these boundaries.
3.
I find after examining pre-war
prehminemy
papers that the question of the limits
of Hong Kong territorial waters was
considered
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.